Archive for October, 2009

What is a problogger?

October 25, 2009

Blog authors, i.e. bloggers, can be divided into many categories. The most common distinction is based on the number of people who read the author’s blog. On the internet there rarely is a middle ground. So we can break up blog authors into those whose blog is read by thousands of readers, and those whose blog is read by a few. This blog is one of the latter but that does not bother me, I write to express my opinions and that is it.

Blog authors whose blog is read by thousands are a minority. This group of blog authors can be further divided into two separate groups. On the one hand there are what I call subject experts and on the other there are probloggers.

The first group, the subject experts, are what I consider the good guys. They are people who have insights and expertise in a specific subject and write interesting and thought provoking articles. I think they really deserve to have that many followers since the content they write is worth it.

The second group, the probloggers, are the equivalent of a get rich quick scheme salesman. They do not write valuable content. Instead they gloat about how they make six figure incomes by writing online tutorials to teach other aspiring blog authors become popular and rich online just like they did. They also offer personalized consultancy to other blog authors on how to become a problogger too.

If something feels to good to be true, most probably it is not true. Everybody should know this by now. Yet these probloggers still manage to rake in money from people who still think that they can make money online from a blog by writing nonsense. If it sounds similar to a pyramid scheme, you are right.

Two things about probloggers irk me. First, nobody with even the slightest sense of proper manners would boast about how much money s/he is making. Secondly, even if you make a living by writing a blog you don’t run around calling yourself a problogger.

Just like any other pyramid scheme, riches are made only by the few at the top who exploit the naivety of their readership. This is done directly when people pay for consultancy and indirectly when new aspiring bloggers start their own blog and make references to their gurus. Inbound links are the equivalent of virtual money on the internet. There are other ways of doing money too, like for instance selling e-books that cliam to give you step by step instructions to become rich with your own blog. Another method is using problogger conferences during which the few who make money take pictures together to show off on their blogs, whilst the masses pay hard earned money hoping to learn and mingle with the established probloggers.

Why did I write this post? Well, because I think if it only helps a handful of people see things for what they really are this blog post would have achieved its aim.

Should I use twitter?

October 24, 2009

The short answer is no but let me explain why. If you need more proof that the internet technology industry is going through yet another bubble phase, look no further than twitter. Twitter is yet more air pumped into the bubble that is the current internet industry. Pushing more air into an over inflated bubble can only lead to one big fast burst.

My first reactions when I heard about twitter and what it is all about were what’s the point. Why invent yet another medium which facilitates yet more nonsense being written. As if the internet is not already chock full of gibberish and repetitions.

They claim that twitter is a revolution in the way people communicate and is providing a new medium where people can express their views on any topic, from religion to politics, to venting frustration at products or lack of support.

The point is that the majority of users on twitter start of strong, as in the rate of tweets not quality content, and then after a week or two, at the most a month suddenly forget all about twitter. Then there are the A listers, people who where popular even before facebook came around. These follow a few people, maybe a hundred, but have 10K+ followers.

Problem is that in 140 characters not even really interesting people such as Joel Spolsky, Jeff Atwood, and Matt Cutts, who normally publish quality posts on their blogs, manage to say really interesting stuff on twitter. I don’t blame them, who can?

If I am interested in following someone’s thoughts and they have a blog it is easy for me to subscribe to their RSS feed, especially using Google Reader. Setting up a blog is very simple and there are sites like wordpress which make it point and click easy.

So you might say just don’t use twitter and be done, what is your problem?

My reply is, yes I did create an account to see for myself what twitter is all about before expressing my opinion and I have to say I only confirmed my initial feelings. In fact, as of today I deleted my twitter account.

The problem with services like twitter is not with the service itself but with the fact that it actually garners support just because it is hyped, millions of people are on twitter and it is free. What worries is the fact that companies like twitter get funding. The only way twitter can make money is if it starts charging for accounts, or includes ads and charges for them, or charges for official corporate accounts to be used as official support channels.

The first option would result in a mass exodus of users, the second option is not really palatable and I doubt it would work for twitter. The third option might make sense but if I have a complaint about a product I would rather go straight to the source rather than just tweet about it in the hope that someone from the company is following certain keywords on twitter.

So yes personally I think twitter is a big shiny over inflated red bubble and would not recommend people use it. As for the industry, I hope that after the latest global economic experience and the first internet bubble investors used more grey matter before they invest in over-hyped useless technology.